The Question of
Casphaxalation of Origony vs.Neoplasmic Plookonia
in 21st Century America


For the serendipitious toothsome gnome, no greater feat, other than the
casphaxalation of origony, or the speculum of pharicystic polygony, can
compare to the embiggened philatelic cosmogony of the praxisticial
elongation of smattered crepuscular vingecortial
hyperstitial parmesian.

For that reason, there can be no cryogenic instigation of feral muttony
for comestibles, other than, or related to, but not wholly corrupted by
paripasu parietal lobes, nor by unco pectin of a baser sort.

A.V. Van Nostrum, M.D.; L.S.R.; D.R.K.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In reference to Dr. Van Nostrum’s assertion that there can be no greater
feat for the serendipitous toothsome gnome than the caxphaxalation of
origony, one can heretofore ascertain that the feral, malevolent
hedgehog has been embargoed by the inflatulation of polyganial
agglomeratiation, whereas the gnome and the riled lemming have been
embiggened by such.

Mayhaps, the sanguineous sycophant, beholding to, but by no means
kayduced by, the buconical torticollis, may forthwith inject a
specularium of neoplasmic palookonia , thus evading pandimania,
clusterbriety , and glitter.

R.D. Hertz, Ph. D.; M.R.N.; B.T.D.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, yes. You have broached the intrinsic fallacipitous theorem of
polyganial agglomeration, but mayhap (and please, bear with me) the sanguinary
tripedal fetusipididus - a fallopian singularity, of uncyclical pepsidae - by
happenstance, is endowed with Oxpolycyclical Xynomes, thereby canceling
any coccyxity of all sorts of gnomes, lemmings and their embiggened ilk.

 If so, then I maintain that caxphaxalation of origony is virtually
unattainable, in fact anomalous, to said gnome and gnomelike creatures,
including, but not limited to bifurcated gnomes, toadstoolphiliacal
gnomes, and knicker-wearing gnomes, dwarves, midgets, panty-wearing
hobgoblins and little fairies attired in masculine clothing.

A.V. Van Nostrum, M.D.; L.S.R.; D.R.K.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It appears that my esteemed collegue Dr. Van Nostrom, in his instistance
that the fallopian singularity of uncyclical pepsidae, has heretofore slighted
the vapidiousiation of the Bimbastic Figarlarian in an oxyiphaliopidic
remonsterance of the Haadatic Bioturb.

Thus, we concur on the aggrevasivness of the aforementioned gnome, hedgehog,
lemming and the much maligned dwarves.

The midgets and panty-wearing hobgoblins not withstanding.

However, the little fairies attired in masculine clothing have failed to breach
the cravatiousness of the Cipridiot. It is to this endevour one must flickulate
the malicent ossiphicalitidy and fallopeonic pectoran in order to achieve jocundity
amoungst the Haadatic Bioturbs and Bimbastic Cipridiots.

As to the question of the toadstoolphiliacal, one can only apostulize that pustulication,
qualmidity and deviled ham may only exacerbate the condition of the
Cu Cuhlainic Skela-wegian.

Without proper thongonian intervention, the ticketty-boo, palaver, and pong may
skivvy the situation.

R.D. Hertz, Ph. D.; M.R.N.; B.T.D.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It sickens me, that you trivialize the mardivant aspects of quantum
dissolution.

Really, Dr. Hertz, You should well have encountered these chillum
and simplistic theories whilst carrying on with your post-doctorate work.

Your supreme lack of intuitiveness as respects the hepacraeteus gravlax has no
facticity, no panache.

Also, I see no need for your rambunctious fulminations.

Next, I suppose you will be postulating the existence of Wyvernian
Partisans. The colonic propensity you embody shall, I fear let loose a torrent
of reductivist pogoers.

That is all I have for today; the wind has gone out of my sails.

Dr. A.V. Van Nostrum, M.D., L.S.R., D.R.K.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Van Nostrum, once again in your wind-breaking ribald, you have gaggelded me
with your underpostualized knexious of the situation at hand.

The recently released documents of the the once Toothsome Gnome, clearly proves the
insectonia of cheetoite of this winkled 'n noggin fuglonian. As well as his whoristic views
held towards the malevolent hedgehog and the like.

The chimpchillian and sysphisian flopidity chortled by this goranxia over the near
atomicial destruction of the Neo-Celtexan lobs the theorms and defenses therein,
espoused by you and your bespecticled bonobian colleagues.

There is no feziwiginess in the Gnome, merely flatuidity and manicality.

The usammatrite oppression of the Bioturbs, hedgehogs, Neo-Celtexans,
masculine fairies, Cirpidiots et. al., will not and cannot be tolerated in a
globlobical society.

My post-graduate nickcavi-calculations have proven this in hypo-idealism.
Time, will lobieth it to the world!

R.D. Hertz, Ph. D.; M.R.N.; B.T.D., OB/GYN.